Appeal No. 2000-0244 Application No. 29/069,936 Since the applied prior art fails to teach or suggest the aesthetic features of the claimed design, we will not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection based on Guillerm, Grothoff and Eke. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOHN F. GONZALES ) Administrative Patent Judge ) vsh 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007