Ex parte BATTAT et al. - Page 1




                      THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for   
               publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.       
                                                                       Paper No. 11          
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                         ____________                                        
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                               
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                         ____________                                        
            Ex parte DAVID BATTAT, SANTOKH S. BADESHA, CLIFFORD O. EDDY,                     
                LOUIS D. FRATANGELO, ARMOLD W. HENRY and ALAN R. KUNTZ                       
                                         ____________                                        
                                    Appeal No. 2000-0291                                     
                                 Application No. 08/873,958                                  
                                         ____________                                        
                                           ON BRIEF                                          
                                         ____________                                        
          Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                          
          Judges.                                                                            
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                             



                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                       
          rejection of claims 1 through 9, which are all of the claims                       
          pending in this application.                                                       
                The appellants’ invention relates to a method for reusing                    
          a fuser member comprised of an outer layer having an original                      

                                             1                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007