THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 11 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID BATTAT, SANTOKH S. BADESHA, CLIFFORD O. EDDY, LOUIS D. FRATANGELO, ARMOLD W. HENRY and ALAN R. KUNTZ ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0291 Application No. 08/873,958 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 9, which are all of the claims pending in this application. The appellants’ invention relates to a method for reusing a fuser member comprised of an outer layer having an original 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007