Ex parte JACKSON - Page 19




          Appeal No. 2000-0305                                      Page 19           
          Application No. 08/887,453                                                  


          Rejection (4)                                                               
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 4 and 5 under              
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by or, in the                       
          alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Andersen.                
          Once again the deficiency of Andersen discussed above with                  
          respect to claim 1 is not cured by this rejection.                          

































Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007