Ex parte KOLADA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0321                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/834,578                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to footwear and insole               
          assemblies for footwear (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the               
          claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the                     
          appellants' brief.                                                          


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Arrowsmith                    717,523                  Jan.  6,             
          1903                                                                        
          (Arrowsmith '523)                                                           
          Arrowsmith                    1,055,306                Mar. 11,             
          1913                                                                        
          (Arrowsmith '306)                                                           
          Lobel                         2,022,247                Nov. 26,             
          1935                                                                        
          Rigandi                       2,063,625                Dec.  8,             
          1936                                                                        
          Gilkerson                          3,233,348                Feb.            
          8, 1966                                                                     
          Brown                         4,510,700                Apr. 16,             
          1985                                                                        
          Meyer                         4,756,096                July 12,             
          1988                                                                        



               Claims 1, 2 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Rigandi in view of Arrowsmith '306               
          or Arrowsmith '523 and Lobel.                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007