Appeal No. 2000-0321 Page 3 Application No. 08/834,578 BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to footwear and insole assemblies for footwear (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Arrowsmith 717,523 Jan. 6, 1903 (Arrowsmith '523) Arrowsmith 1,055,306 Mar. 11, 1913 (Arrowsmith '306) Lobel 2,022,247 Nov. 26, 1935 Rigandi 2,063,625 Dec. 8, 1936 Gilkerson 3,233,348 Feb. 8, 1966 Brown 4,510,700 Apr. 16, 1985 Meyer 4,756,096 July 12, 1988 Claims 1, 2 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Rigandi in view of Arrowsmith '306 or Arrowsmith '523 and Lobel.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007