The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROY M. WIELAND and BLAINE L. WIELAND
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0322
Application No. 08/855,921
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection (Paper No. 7, mailed July 2, 1998) of claims 1, 3,
6-8, 11-23 and 25. Claims 4, 5, 10 and 24 were indicated to
be rejected on the summary page of the final rejection,
however, no rejection of claims 4, 5, 10 and 24 was included
in the final rejection. Accordingly, claims 4, 5, 10 and 24
are not before us in this appeal and the status of those
claims is unclear from the record. Claims 2 and 9 have been
canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007