Ex Parte WAKAYAMA - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
            for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.

                                                                 Paper No. 15         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte SEAN R. WAKAYAMA                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0408                                 
                              Application No. 08/917,480                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the claims pending in            
          this application.                                                           


               We REVERSE and REMAND.                                                 


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates generally to aerodynamics            
          and, more particularly, to a reconfiguration control system for             






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007