Ex parte PALERMO - Page 13




          Appeal No. 2000-0448                                                        
          Application No. 08/605,765                                                  


               We will accordingly sustain the rejection of claim 20, as              
          well as of dependent claims 21 to 25, which have not been                   
          argued separately.                                                          
               The rejection of claim 27 will not be sustained, since                 
          the examiner has not identified, and we do not find, any                    
          suggestion or teaching in either reference of the particular                
          step called for by this claim.                                              
               The rejection of claim 28 will be sustained.  As noted                 
          above concerning claims 1 and 2, Guglielmi discloses initially              
          deploying the coil at the target site, as claimed, before                   
          applying any electrical energy.                                             


















                                          13                                          





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007