Ex parte FUJITA et al. - Page 1






                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 26              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                     Ex parte NOZOMU FUJITA and HAJIME TSUJIKAWA                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0472                                  
                               Application 08/868,536                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 7 to              
          16, all the claims remaining in the application.                            
               The claims on appeal are drawn to a stylet assembly for                
          use with a catheter (claims 7 to 13 and 16), or to a connector              
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007