Appeal No. 2000-0505 Application 08/856,743 the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention" (answer, page 3). Claims 1 and 3 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Strong in view of Koch. Claims 1, 3, 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Koch. Claims 1, 3, 4, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cox. The examiner includes an objection to the drawings on page 3 of the examiner's answer. Such an objection is not an appealable matter. Presumably, this objection is pertinent to the 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection of claim 10. OPINION We have carefully reviewed the rejections on appeal in light of the arguments of the appellants and the examiner. As a result of this review, we have come to the determination that claim 10 is not drawn to subject matter which is not enabled by the specification. We have further come to the conclusion that the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007