Ex parte KARSTEN et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2000-0513                                                        
          Application 08/803,047                                                      


          as being unpatentable over Fry in view of Maldanis.                         


               Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 10 and 12) and to the examiner’s answer                  
          (Paper No. 11) for the respective positions of the appellants               
          and the examiner with regard to the merits of these                         
          rejections.                                                                 


                                     DISCUSSION                                       


          I. The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 1 through 4, 7,               
          8, 10 through 12, 15 through 19, 22, 23, 25 through 27 and 29               
          through 32 as being anticipated by Fry.                                     


               Fry discloses a vending machine having a cabinet-like                  
          construction composed of a lower base portion 1 and an upper                
          column portion.  The lower base portion 1 includes lockable                 
          front doors 2, a top 58 having sample display pockets 55 and                
          coin slots 54 therein, and a coin hopper 62 and coin box 66                 
          within the base portion beneath the coin slots.  The upper                  
          column portion includes lockable rear doors 6, a top 17, front              
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007