Appeal No. 2000-0526 Application No. 08/818,958 inserted into the patient straight up and down at times (answer, page 5). Rejections based on 35 U.S.C. § 103 must rest on a factual basis. In making such a rejection, the examiner has the initial duty of supplying the requisite factual basis and may not, because of doubts that the invention is patentable, resort to speculation, unfounded assumptions or hindsight reconstruction to supply deficiencies in the factual basis. In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 177-78 (CCPA 1967). As recognized by the examiner, Farris I does not teach placing the gas trap chamber on the rear wall of the syringe. In fact, Farris teaches that the air trap chamber is positioned on one side of the container in a location that is generally perpendicular to the direction that the container is squeezed to collapse it (column 2, lines 41-44). This teaching would appear to suggest that the rear wall might not be a suitable location for the gas trap chamber and that the "various locations" referred to in column 4, line 40, may, in fact, be limited to locations on the side (peripheral) wall 12d, for example. We also note that the examiner has not 16Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007