Appeal No. 2000-0563
Application No. 08/813,965
subject matter recited in claim 14 and the prior art are such
that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at
the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary
skill in the art. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the
standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 14, or of
claims 15 through 21 which depend therefrom, as being
unpatentable over Ulatowski in view of Haglund.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 14 through
21 is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007