Appeal No. 2000-0865 Page 6 Application No. 08/910,822 torque value at a first rate of change until the desired torque value is obtained or a preselected period of time elapses; (3) when the current torque value does not correspond to the desired torque value and the preselected period of time has elapsed, changing the current torque value at a second rate of change until the desired torque value is obtained. However, these limitations are clearly not suggested by the applied prior art. In that regard, while it may have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the torque control system of Takasaki by incorporating features of either the control system of Kuriyama or the shift control system of Sakaki, we see no suggestion in the applied prior art for modifying Takasaki to arrive at the claimed invention. In fact, the examiner never ascertained the differences between the applied prior art and the claims at issue and never determined that it would have been obvious to arrive at the claimed invention. In our view, the only suggestion for modifying the applied prior art to arrive at the claimed invention stems from hindsight knowledge derived from the appellants' ownPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007