Ex parte HUBER et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2000-0865                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 08/910,822                                                  


          torque value at a first rate of change until the desired                    
          torque value is obtained or a preselected period of time                    
          elapses; (3) when the current torque value does not correspond              
          to the desired torque value and the preselected period of time              
          has elapsed, changing the current torque value at a second                  
          rate of change until the desired torque value is obtained.                  
          However, these limitations are clearly not suggested by the                 
          applied prior art.  In that regard, while it may have been                  
          obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having               
          ordinary skill in the art to modify the torque control system               
          of Takasaki by incorporating features of either the control                 
          system of Kuriyama or the shift control system of Sakaki, we                
          see no suggestion in the applied prior art for modifying                    
          Takasaki to arrive at the claimed invention.  In fact, the                  
          examiner never ascertained the differences between the applied              
          prior art and the claims at issue and never determined that it              
          would have been obvious to arrive at the claimed invention.                 


               In our view, the only suggestion for modifying the                     
          applied prior art to arrive at the claimed invention stems                  
          from hindsight knowledge derived from the appellants' own                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007