Appeal No. 2000-0875 Page 3
Application No. 08/945,138
12, mailed January 25, 1999) and the answer (Paper No. 19,
mailed November 9, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning
in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 18,
filed September 30, 1999) for the appellants' arguments
thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellants' specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellants and the
examiner. Upon evaluation of all the evidence before us, it
is our conclusion that the evidence adduced by the examiner is
insufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness
with respect to the claims under appeal. Accordingly, we will
not sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 10 and 14 to 18
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Our reasoning for this determination
follows.
In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner
bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007