THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CLIFFORD T. CALFEE
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-1348
Application No. 29/092,024
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STAAB, KRATZ, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of the following design claim:
The ornamental design for a document holder as shown
and described.
The ornamental design is characterized by a substantially
rectangular upstanding panel having a pair of vertically
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007