Ex parte FRUECHTENICHT - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1474                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/962,902                                                  


               Claims 20 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)               
          as being anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35                    
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 as obvious over Mueller.                                              


               Claims 2, 8, 22, 24, 28, 30 and 34-37 stand rejected                   
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Mueller in                 
          view of either Kondo, Okumura, or Gojo.                                     


               Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Mueller in view of either Kondo, Okumura, or              
          Gojo and further in view of Stevenson.                                      


               Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Mueller in view of either Kondo, Okumura, or              
          Gojo as applied to claim 24 above, and further in view of                   
          Stevenson.                                                                  


               Claims 4, 5, 9-12, 14-18 and 32 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious in view of Mueller.                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007