Appeal No. 2000-1479 Page 7
Application No. 08/915,355
above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 5
to 9, 14 to 19 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.
The obviousness rejection
We have also reviewed the Davis reference additionally
applied in the rejection of claims 4 and 24 (dependent on
claims 1 and 23) but find nothing therein which makes up for
the deficiencies of Roman discussed above regarding claims 1
and 23. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 4 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007