Ex parte EEKHOFF - Page 12




          Appeal No. 2000-1489                                      Page 12           
          Application No. 09/188,421                                                  


          knowledge derived from the appellant's own disclosure.  The                 
          use of such hindsight knowledge to support an obviousness                   
          rejection under 35 U.S.C.                                                   
          § 103 is, of course, impermissible.  See, for example, W. L.                
          Gore and Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1553,               
          220 USPQ 303, 312-13 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S.               
          851 (1984).                                                                 


               For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the                   
          examiner to reject claims 2 to 4 and 6 to 8 under 35 U.S.C. §               
          103 is reversed.                                                            


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claims 1 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed and the                    
          decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 to 4 and 6 to 8                 
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                          














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007