Ex parte ESROCK - Page 11




               Appeal No. 2000-1763                                                                       Page 11                 
               Application No. 09/227,037                                                                                         


                                                        CONCLUSION                                                                
                      To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-15 under 35 U.S.C.                            
               § 251 and under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 (both description and enablement                            
               requirements) is reversed.  The application is remanded to the examiner for consideration of the                   
               above-mentioned issues.                                                                                            
                                               REVERSED AND REMANDED                                                              






                                      CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                          )                                             
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    ) BOARD OF PATENT                             
                                      JEFFREY V. NASE                               )     APPEALS                                 
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )       AND                                   
                                                                                    )  INTERFERENCES                              
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                      JENNIFER D. BAHR                              )                                             
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                             













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007