The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is binding precedent of the Trial Section Paper 4 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ PAUL S. WATERMAN, Junior Party, (Application 09/049,225), v. JEAN-LUC BIRBAUM, JEAN RODY, MARIO SLONGO, ANDREAS VALET and ROLAND A. E. WINTER Senior Party (Patent 5,736,597). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,500 _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER TERMINATING INTERFERENCE A. Background The interference was declared 9 February 2000 and involves a Waterman application and a Birbaum patent. Unknown to the board at the time the interference was declared, was an express abandonment of the Waterman application which had been filed by Waterman on 18 January 2000. By virtue of a JOINT COMMUNICATIONPage: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007