The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 3 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ MICHAEL W. J. WEST Junior Party, (Application 08/467,241), v. PADMANABHAN SUNDARARAMAN, JAMES A. CLAAR and CHARLES M. KANIA, Senior Party (Patent 5,105,010). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,511 _______________ ORDER TERMINATING INTERFERENCE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION A. Discussion The interference was declared on 15 March 2000. At the time the interference was declared, it was the board's belief that a maintenance fee had been paid in connection with the Sundararaman patent involved in the interference. On Monday, 20 March 2000, counsel for Sundararaman (William J. Uhl, Esq.) had discussion with Administrator Sally C. Medley in which he advised that the maintenance fee had not been paid and the Sundararaman's assignee PPG Industries, Inc., had noPage: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007