SUNDARARAMAN et al. V. WEST - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being             
                    entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.        
         Paper 3                                                                
         Filed by:  Trial Section Merits Panel                                  
         Box Interference                                                       
         Washington, D.C.  20231                                                
         Tel:  703-308-9797                                                     
         Fax:  703-305-0942                                                     
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                  
                                _______________                                 
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                      
                                AND INTERFERENCES                               
                                _______________                                 
                               MICHAEL W. J. WEST                               
                                  Junior Party,                                 
                            (Application 08/467,241),                           
                                       v.                                       
                     PADMANABHAN SUNDARARAMAN, JAMES A. CLAAR                   
                              and CHARLES M. KANIA,                             
                                  Senior Party                                  
                               (Patent 5,105,010).                              
                                _______________                                 
                         Patent Interference No. 104,511                        
                                _______________                                 
              ORDER TERMINATING INTERFERENCE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION           

              A.  Discussion                                                    
              The interference was declared on 15 March 2000.  At the time      
         the interference was declared, it was the board's belief that a        
         maintenance fee had been paid in connection with the Sundararaman      
         patent involved in the interference.                                   
              On Monday, 20 March 2000, counsel for Sundararaman (William       
         J. Uhl, Esq.) had discussion with Administrator Sally C. Medley        
         in which he advised that the maintenance fee had not been paid         
         and the Sundararaman's assignee PPG Industries, Inc., had no           






Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007