Ex parte AGARWAL - Page 1




                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                 
              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                           
              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                                                                                      Paper No. 52                         

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                      __________                                                           
                                         Ex parte SURENDRA H. AGARWAL                                                      
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                 Appeal No. 1995-2036                                                      
                                                 Application 07/920,009                                                    
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
              Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
              WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                     This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 3, 4,                             
              9 through 11, 16, 17, and 21 through 29, which are all of the claims remaining in the                        
              application.                                                                                                 
                     Claims 23 and 26, which are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, read as                     
              follows:                                                                                                     

                                                            1                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007