Appeal No. 1995-2772 Application 08/001,063 common limitation has not been established by the examiner using the three primary references, and we do not find that the additional references provide any teachings that would have rendered the claims of Rejections II, IV and V unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, Rejections II, IV and V are reversed. REVERSED William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) Joan Ellis ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Douglas W. Robinson ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 13Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007