THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JUERGEN MOHR, KNUT OPPENLAENDER,
WALTER DENZINGER, HEINRICH HARTMANN, RICHARD BAUR,
CHARALAMPOS GOUSETIS and ALEXANDER KUD
________________
Appeal No. 1995-4997
Application No. 08/089,436
________________
HEARD: February 7, 2000
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 5,
6, 8-10 and 12-20, all the claims remaining in the present
application. Claim 5 is reproduced below:
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007