Ex parte RIEGER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 26              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                              Ex parte BERNHARD RIEGER,                               
                                VOLKER REIFFENRATH,                                   
                                and REINHARD HITTICH                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1995-5117                                  
                               Application 08/067,154                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before GARRIS, OWENS, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 2                
          through 6, 10 through 16 and 18 through 20.  Via an amendment               
          filed subsequent to the notice of appeal, claim 6 was                       

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007