THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte R. B. GUPTA
and ROBERT G. LEES
______________
Appeal No. 1996-01911
Application 08/001,697
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 5, 10 through 12, 14 through 19, 33 and 34. Claims 8, 9, 20 through 32 and 35, which are2
1We decide concurrently herewith Appeal No. 1997-4365 in application 08/463,726, filed June 6,
1995, which according to appellants is a division of the present application.
2See specification, page 20, and the amendments of March 17, 1994 (Paper No. 5) and of
September 2, 1994 (Paper No. 7).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007