Appeal No. 1996-0438 Application No. 08/090,343 increasing the fluidity of the resin mixture. Significantly, we find that appealed claim 26 encompasses compositions which comprise a major amount of a polyepoxide and a minor amount of a monoepoxide. This is so because page 15 of appellants' specification expressly discloses that "[t]he epoxy compounds can be monoepoxies, or, preferably, a polyepoxide having an average of at least two epoxy groups per molecule." (emphasis added.) Since the specification discloses that a polyepoxide is preferable to a monoepoxide, it is reasonable to interpret claim 26, by virtue of the "comprises" language, as embracing a major amount of the preferred polyepoxide and a minor amount of the non-preferred monoepoxide. While appellants maintain that "Heilman teaches only limited application of the monoepoxide" (page 4 of appellants' response of April 3, 1995), the appealed claims encompass compositions comprising limited, or minor, amounts of a monoepoxide. Also, since Heilman teaches that "the incorporation of a monoepoxy diluent may reduce the cross- 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007