THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte V.N. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, FRANK J. WEIGERT
and CARL G. KRESPAN
________________
Appeal No. 1996-0683
Application 08/116,938
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before PAK, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 and 7. Claims 2 through 6 and 8 through
24 stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being
directed to a non-elected invention. See the final Office
action dated December 8, 1994 (Paper No. 10).
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007