THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KAZUYUKI OKUI
and MAKOTO SHIOKAWA
______________
Appeal No. 96-0898
Application 08/083,838
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 8 through 22 and 24 as amended subsequent to the final rejection, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.1
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
sustain the ground of rejection of the appealed claims, of which claim 8 is representative, under 35
1 See the amendment of November 4, 1994 (Paper No. 9), in which claim 23 was canceled.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007