Paper No. 40
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte HARTMUT BEUG,
MAX L. BIRNSTIEL,
MATTHEW COTTEN, ERNST WAGNER
and HARALD KANDOLF
______________
Appeal No. 1996-1005
Application 07/947,982
_______________
HEARD: March 7, 2000
_______________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GRON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 67, 69, 71,
73 through 80, 96, 97, 99 and 104 through 106, all the claims remaining in the application.
Claims 67 and 96 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007