Ex parte MATTSSON et al. - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                   

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                  not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                      Paper No. 22              

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                         ____________                                                           

                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                           

                                 Ex parte CHRISTER JAN MATTSSON, CARL M.E. SVAHN                                                
                                                   and MICHAEL P. WEBER                                                         
                                                         ____________                                                           

                                                     Appeal No. 1996-1009                                                       
                                                   Application No. 07/949,551                                                   
                                                         ____________                                                           

                                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                           

               Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GRON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          

                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner finally rejecting claims             

               16 and 18 and refusing to allow claims 15 and 17 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. 1                 





                      1The amendment filed November 8, 1994 (Paper No. 10), amending claims 15, 17, 19 and 21, was entered by   
               the examiner in the advisory action mailed November 17, 1994.                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007