THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTER JAN MATTSSON, CARL M.E. SVAHN
and MICHAEL P. WEBER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1009
Application No. 07/949,551
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GRON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner finally rejecting claims
16 and 18 and refusing to allow claims 15 and 17 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. 1
1The amendment filed November 8, 1994 (Paper No. 10), amending claims 15, 17, 19 and 21, was entered by
the examiner in the advisory action mailed November 17, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007