Appeal No. 1996-1049 Application No. 08/238,681 In a reply brief filed on October 30, 1995 (paper no. 11), appellant requested that claim 1, which is the sole independent claim directed toward the molded element, be amended to read as follows: 1. In a molded element containing therein a horizontally disposed bore for receiving a fastener therein, the improvement comprising: a plurality of downwardly disposed first elements having distal ends, said plurality of first elements being spaced apart from one another; and a plurality of upwardly disposed second elements having distal ends, said plurality of second elements being spaced apart from one another; wherein said plurality of first elements are offset from said plurality of second elements; wherein said distal ends of said plurality of first elements and said distal ends of said plurality of second elements are outwardly arcuate and combine to form a horizontally disposed bore cylindrical having at least one end open for receiving a threaded fastener therein. This amendment, which added “are outwardly arcuate and”, “cylindrical” and “threaded” in the last element of claim 1, and canceled claim 3, was not submitted in a separate paper and entered into the record. In a subsequent amendment filed on May 27, 1997 (paper no. 15), an amendment was submitted which included adding “cylindrical” but did not include adding 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007