THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TOSHISUKE SAKAI
and NARUMI NAGASE
__________
Appeal No. 1996-1088
Application 08/251,999
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-15, which are all of the claims in the application.
THE INVENTION
Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward an
apparatus for electrolyzing source water such as city water or
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007