THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte Thomas R. Barnett, James J. Elting,
Michael E. Kamarck, and Axel W. Kretschmer
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1090
Application No. 08/027,974
____________
Heard: March 9, 2000
____________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and LORIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the final
rejection of claim 19. On consideration of the record, we
reverse the Examiner's decision rejecting this claim.
The sole claim on appeal is
19. A peptide having an amino acid sequence
corresponding to the entire amino acid sequence or a
fragment thereof of the expression product of a cell
that is transfected, infected or injected with a
recombinant cloning vehicle, said fragment
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007