Appeal No. 96-3448
Application No.08/150,304
The examiner has enter two rejections.
I.
The examiner has rejected claims 1-34 as being
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Michelson, U.S. Patent
3,755,147 (1973).
Upon consideration of the brief on appeal and the
examiner’s answer, it is
ORDERED that the rejection is reversed essentially for
the reasons given in Section A and Section B, parts 1 and 2 of
our opinion in Ex parte Chang, Appeal 96-0460 (Bd. Pat. App. &
Int. Feb. 3, 1999) (paper 22) (copy attached)
II.
Claims 1-34 have been rejected for obviousness type
double patenting in view of the claims in the application
08/169,107.
The rejection is dismissed because the application
08/169,107 is now abandoned.
REVERSED
)
FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007