Appeal No. 1996-1561 Page 9 Application No. 08/230,075 inventor who was dealing with this problem, such as one who wished to attach a member to the end of the bowl fill hose of a water closet. SUMMARY The rejection of claims 1-7 as being unpatentable over Preston and Baird is sustained. The rejection of claim 8 as being unpatentable over Preston and Baird is not sustained. The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007