Appeal No. 1996-1974 Application No. 07/930,738 § 103; and even more so considering the fact that carbon black particles are broadly defined in appellant’s specification. To wit, the specification (pages 9-10) allows that such particles may be of “varying graphitic content, size, morphology and shape”, and “can range from highly structured tree-like shapes to minimally structured rod-like shapes”. An argument is made in the Reply Brief (page 2) that appellant’s carbon black particles are generally spherical rather than fibrous, filamentary or sheet-like. This argument is belied by the broad definition in appellant’s own specification. Moreover, we take note of appellant’s acknowledgment in his specification (page 1, l. 19-29; page 3, l. 14-17 and l. 28-36) that carbon black is widely used as a conductive carbon material in combination with conductive polymers in applications similar to those contemplated by Naarmann; thus lending support to the conclusion that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it prima facie obvious to employ carbon black particles, in particular, as the carbon source in Naarmann with the expectation of obtaining a conductive composite material suitable for the purposes contemplated by Naarmann. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007