Ex parte BEN-BASSAT et al. - Page 23





                Appeal No. 1996-2123                                                                                                          
                Application No. 08/069,458                                                                                                    




                (claims 1-48) and add new claims.@  The examiner states in the March 25, 1992 Office Action (Paper No.                        
                6), at page 2, A[t]he receipt of the Preliminary Amendment on April 10, 1991, has been acknowledged and                       
                it has been entered. . . . In addition with respect to the claims, only claims 1-45 have been canceled and                    
                entered as such, and claims 49-55 have been added.@  From this point forward there is no further                              
                discussion on the record with regards to the existence of claims 46-48, or how claims 49-55 were entered                      
                without being renumbered according to 37 C.F.R. ' 1.121.  In addition, upon examination of the claims as                      
                they appear at pages 66-71 of the specification, claims 1-45 were never physically canceled from the                          
                application.                                                                                                                  
                         Adding to the confusion, the examiner indicates that claims 48-55 are on appeal.  See, File                          
                Wrapper=s index of claims.  Claim 48 does not exist in this record.  In addition, page 1 of appellants= Brief                 
                indicates that A[c]laims 49-55 have been rejected.  All rejections of all claims are being appealed.@  The                    
                Examiner=s Answer confirms A[t]he statement of the status of claims contained in the brief is correct.@                       
                         Upon return of the application, the examiner should take a step back to evaluate the status of the                   
                claims and then take the necessary corrective action.  The examiner should notify appellants of the correct                   
                status of the claims.                                                                                                         
                Deposit of Biological Materials:                                                                                              
                         Claim 55 references the following Acetobacter strains ATCC Nos. 53264, 53263 and 53524.                              
                There are two possible interpretations of this claim: (1) that the mutant strain is ATCC Nos. 53264, 53263                    
                or 53524; or (2) according to appellants that the mutant strain is a mutant of ATCC Nos. 53264, 53263 or                      
                53524.  However, either interpretation, appears to make access of this material, at this location (the                        
                ATCC), necessary for the satisfaction of the statutory requirements for patentability under 35 U.S.C. '                       



                                                                     23                                                                       







Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007