THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 48
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte IAN H. COATES, ALEXANDER W. OXFORD, PETER C. NORTH,
THOMAS MILLER, ANTHONY D. BAXTER and KEVIN I. HAMMOND
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2321
Application No. 08/137,228
____________
HEARD: March 21, 2000
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 2, 6, 8 through 10 and 12
as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the
amendment dated Feb. 13, 1995, Paper No. 33, entered as per
the advisory Action dated Mar. 2, 1995, Paper No. 35, and the
amendment accompanying the Brief dated May 15, 1995, Paper No.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007