Appeal No. 1996-2350
Application 07/843,833
Singh, The Bleaching of Pulp, pages 578-580, Tappi Press, 1
Atlanta, 1979.
The examiner additionally relies on the following
listed patent in a rejection based on the judicially created
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting:
Tsai (Tsai '201) 2 5,389,201 Feb. 14,
1995
Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Tsai '124 in view of Singh, Phillips
and Schwarzl. Claims 1-6 stand rejected under the judicially
1Pages 578-580 were the only pages of the Singh reference
found of record. The examiner specifically refers to page 579
of Singh in the stated rejection under review (answer, page
4). Accordingly, our consideration of the § 103 rejection
utilizing the Singh reference as part of the evidence of
obviousness is limited to the above-noted pages 578-580 of
Singh in combination with the other evidence relied upon by
the examiner.
2We note that the examiner does not separately list this
patent on a Notice of References Cited (Form PTO-892) of
record.
Page 4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007