THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GERD SAUER
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-2388
Application No. 08/147,485
______________
HEARD: JUNE 10, 1999
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant requests that we reconsider our decision of
March 8, 2000 wherein we sustained the Examiner’s rejection of
claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
In our previous decision, we determined that the Examiner
had established a prima facie case of obviousness based on
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007