Appeal No. 1996-2598
Application No. 08/220,212
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner (I) to reject claims 5-10 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, as based on new matter and because the specification fails to provide an
adequate written description of the claimed invention, (II) to reject claims 5 and 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Blanco and (III) to reject claims 5-10 and 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cox taken with Blanco, Lee and Cassiday is reversed.
REVERSED
WILLIAM F. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 9 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007