THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RU J. JENG, JAYANT KUMAR, BRAJA K. MANDAL
and SUKANT K. TRIPATHY
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2690
Application 07/967,787
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, LIEBERMAN, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-13, and
37, all of the claims pending in the application.
Claims 1, 2, and 37 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and read as
follows:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007