THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ATUL D. AYER, RICHARD L.-C YIEH, BRENDA J. POLLOCK and PATRICK S.-L WONG _____________ Appeal No. 1996-2784 Application No. 08/069,069 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before, STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and DOWNEY and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 6 and 7, the only claims remaining in the application. Claims 6 and 7 read as follows: 6. A method for administering an antiepileptic drug to the gastrointestinal tract of humans, wherein the method comprises: 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007