THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ATUL D. AYER, RICHARD L.-C YIEH,
BRENDA J. POLLOCK and PATRICK S.-L WONG
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-2784
Application No. 08/069,069
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before, STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and
DOWNEY and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 6 and 7, the only claims remaining in the
application. Claims 6 and 7 read as follows:
6. A method for administering an antiepileptic drug
to the gastrointestinal tract of humans, wherein the
method comprises:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007