THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCIS L. RICHTER, JAMES WILSON and
DANIEL E. PEDERSEN
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2873
Application No. 08/209,194
____________
HEARD: May 1, 2000
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 50 through 65 and 67 through 80 which
are all of the claims pending in the application. Claim 66
was canceled subsequent to the final Office action dated June
26, 1995, Paper No. 9.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007