Ex parte PEDERSEN - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
          for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.

                                                               Paper No. 17           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                   Ex parte FRANCIS L. RICHTER, JAMES WILSON and                      
                                 DANIEL E. PEDERSEN                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1996-2873                                  
                             Application No. 08/209,194                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                 HEARD: May 1, 2000                                   
                                    ____________                                      
          Before GARRIS, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           





                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s                    
          refusal to allow claims 50 through 65 and 67 through 80 which               
          are all of the claims pending in the application.  Claim 66                 
          was canceled subsequent to the final Office action dated June               
          26, 1995, Paper No. 9.                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007