Appeal No. 1996-2883
Application No. 08/172,466
to said first sheet member and form a pocket therebetween for
receiving and holding said filmstrip of a first size, said
pocket having an opening through which said filmstrip can be
slid into and out of said pocket.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Jones 2,252,632 Aug. 12, 1941
Reyniers 2,487,982 Nov. 15, 1949
Kogane et al. (Kogane) 4,286,869 Sep. 01, 1981
Roberg 4,629,070 Dec. 16, 1986
Kumanomido 4,804,989 Feb. 14, 1989
Claims 1-3, 6-14, 17, 18, 20 and 21 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings
of Jones in view of Kumanomido, Roberg or Kogane. Claims 22-
24 and 27-31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Jones in view of
Kumanomido, Roberg or Kogane and further in view of Reyniers.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answers for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007