THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FRANK DERUYCK,
and WILFRIED COPPENS
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-2928
Application 08/313,727
______________
HEARD: MAY 1, 2000
_______________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 5, 6, 8
through 12, 14 through 17, and 19 through 23 which are all the claims remaining in the application.1
1Claim 23 is inadvertently omitted from Appellants’ Brief. See Notice of Appeal filed April 18, 1995 which
included claim 23.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007