Ex parte CUNNANE et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-2961                                                        
          Application No. 08/342,827                                                  


                    said first system yarns being hollow, synthetic                   
          monofilament yarns having an O-shaped cross-section and an                  
          internal core void of at least 16%, being compressible from a               
          substantially round cross-section to a fully flattened cross-               
          section when subjected to nip pressures of at least 200 psi,                
          and being sufficiently resilient to rebound to an uncompressed              
          state after passing through a press nip; and                                
                    said base fabric being woven and finished such that               
          in said finished base fabric:                                               
                         portions of said first system yarns which                    
                    contact said second system yarns have at least a                  
                    partially flattened cross-section, and                            
                         said first system yarns remain substantially                 
                    unflattened in cross-section thereby defining                     
                    resiliently compressible cushioning for enhancing                 
                    wet press felt performance in dewatering an aqueous               
                    paper web through a press nip.                                    
               The examiner has not applied prior art in the rejection                
          of the appealed claims.                                                     
               Appealed claims 15, 16, 23 and 25 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  Claims 15-19, 21-23 and 25               
          stand rejected under the judicially created doctrine of                     
          obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over                
          claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,368,696.                                   
               The present application is a continuation of U.S.                      
          Application No. 07/955,513, filed October 2, 1992.  The parent              
          application issued as Patent No. 5,368,696.  This patent is                 
          the basis for the examiner's double patenting rejection.                    
                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007