Ex parte SCHRODER - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1996-3028                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/270,429                                                                                                             


                 in a              non-milk dairy product for consumption, the dairy                                                                    
                 product being substantially pure and free of impurities from                                                                           
                 the               dairy starting material; and                                                                                         
                                   packaging the substantially pure non-milk dairy                                                                      
                                   beverage.                                                                                                            
                          The examiner has relied upon the following references as                                                                      
                 evidence of obviousness:                                                                                                               
                 Girsh                          4,954,361          Sep.  4,                                                                             
                 1990                                                                                                                                   
                 Ermens et al. (Ermens)         0 364 053          Apr. 18,                                                                             
                 1990                                                                                                                                   
                 (Published European Patent Application)                                                                                                
                          Appellant has relied upon the following references in                                                                         
                 rebuttal to the examiner’s evidence of obviousness (Brief,                                                                             
                 Appendices B and C):                                                                                                                   
                 Dairy Research Review, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 1985 (Author and page                                                                          
                 nos. are unknown)                                                                                                                      
                 Jack Mans, “Fines as High as $100,000 Per Day,” Dairy Foods,                                                                           
                 p. 89, Apr. 1993.                                                                                                                      
                          The examiner has made a new ground of rejection in the                                                                        
                 Answer, with all of the claims on appeal now rejected under                                                                            
                 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Ermens or Girsh (Answer,                                                                          
                 pages 3-4).   We reverse both of the examiner’s rejections for2                                                                                                                  

                          2Although the examiner has not explicitly stated that the                                                                     
                 final rejection of claims 1-16, 18, 20 and 23-26 under § 103                                                                           
                 over Girsh in view of Coulter ( U.S. Patent No. 2,712,504,                                                                             
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007