THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT M. PORTER and MICHAEL L. MUELLER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3126
Application No. 08/300,5861
____________
HEARD: January 10, 2000
____________
Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 3, 5, 8 through 10, 12, 21 through 23,
25, 28, 30, 32, 35, 38, and 52 through 55. Claims 1, 4, 6, 7,
1Application for patent filed September 2, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/098,356, filed July 30, 1993, now
abandoned; which is a National stage application under
35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/US92/00844, filed January 30, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007